000			03558nam a2200313Ia 4500
005			20260803094222.0
008			251212s9999 xx 000 0 und d
245	1		_aThe Development of student portal for Sacred Heart School of Cavite / _cRoselle J. Davidas, Daryl D. Estoque, Macrey S. Rosano.
240	1		_aFar Eastern University - Cavite
100			_aBachelor of Science in information Technology
100			_d2014
700			_aXi, 303 pages : color illustrations
700			_a28 cm
700	0		_aTH 005.74 D2808 2014
110			_aTH0085
260			_aEnglish : _bCollege Library,
250			_aManagement information systems -- Student aid ; Information systems ; Information technology -- Research ; Application software ; Student portal -- Research ; Student portal (Application software) _xResearch
300			_aThe Chapter 1 discussed the background of the study, statement of the problems, purpose of the study, conceptual framework, project description, scope and limitation, significant of the study and definition of terms conducted within the School of Sacred Heart of Cavite. The proponents conducted a study that helps the proponents to create this type of system. The scope and limitaion is used by the proponents to showcase the capabilities of this system. The system will be the new solution for the school`s problems. The chapter 2 discussed the literature, studies and system to help the proponents while developing the student portal. The literature, studies and system is from the books or the reference that help in acquiring the idea of the nature of the system. The chapter 3 discussed the way how the application was developed. It was composed of system objectives, paradigm, and feasibility composed of technical, operational, economic, schedule and political, logical and physical design and system valuation. The proponents use three diagrams to identify the other existing system and how to improve it. Chapter 4 discussed about results when the developers conducted an interview and data gathering and been evaluated by the expert and end -user. The system was able to get good evaluation in terms of security, design, functionality, maintability, reability, and risk management, wherein the developers meet the objective of the study. The evaluators gave a result with an average of 4.228 with the descriptive interpretation of very good. For the Q-test evaluation for security, front end user got 0.55 while the expert user got 0.67, design for front end user got 0.46 while the expert user got 0.8, functionality for front end 0.50 and expert user 0.75, maintability for front end got 0.63 while for expert user got 1, risk mangement end user got 1 whileexpert user got 0.4, reliability for front end user got 1 and for the exper user got 0.25 which means that the evaluation is passed the 90%, 95% and 99% confidence level. In Chapter 5 the proponents presents the summary of findings, conclusion and recommendations. The conclusion given by the proponents answering the system objectives and also gathered in the evaluation from end and expert users. This chapter shows the feedback which therefore conclude the system was able to satisfied the client according to what thay to see on the project.: _b1
300			_a1 pages
300			_d0
490			_aThesis
500			_a0
020			_atext
650			_aUnmediated
600		4	_avolume
942			_2lcc _ctd _ajpascua _b2019-03-06 15:19:52 _ddsolimen _e2025-05-21 08:52:34
943			_b0 _c0 _d0 _e1 _f0 _g0 _h0 _i0 _j0
998			_a10930
999			_c10861 _d10861